The History of Radionics, UKACO

UKACO was a company that started up in the late 1940’s and continued into the 1950’s.  It was formed by three men Curtis P. Upton, William J. Kunth, and Howard Armstrong. What was unique about UAKCO was they killed insects that were destroying farmer’s crops, not by spraying the crops with a ton of pesticide. They killed the insects using radionics, and did so with far more success and for a lot less money than  when the farmers sprayed  their fields.

The three men, Upton , Kunth, and Armstrong traveled rural areas of the United States telling farmers that they could get rid of various kinds of insect pests that were eating their crops better than the farmers could do with their chemical sprays.  Understandably the farmers were skeptical, but UKACO offered the farmers a contract that stated: “no control, no pay”. The farmers had nothing to lose if they weren’t satisfied with UKACO’s results they wouldn’t pay.

The farmers must have gotten really skeptical when they saw the UKACO boys in action. They would take a photograph of the farmer’s field, then they would “paint” a small amount of insecticide onto the photo, they would then place the photo in a radionic instrument made by Galen T. Hieronymus then turn the instrument on and broadcast to the field in the photo.

But the amazing thing was they got results, better results than anyone got spraying their crops with insecticide. In one experiment an ariel photo was taken of a corn field and one corner of the photo was cut off. The field had a heavy infestation of Japanese Beetles. They broadcast to the field with their radionics machine as described above. After the broadcasts, 80 to 90 per cent of the beetles had died or left the field. In the corner of the field that was cut off in the photo, the beetle infestation was still 100 per cent.

The success of UKACO didn’t make the guys at the chemical companies very happy. The chemical companies got together with the USDA ( United States Department of Agriculture) with the intention of putting UKACO out of business. They (the USDA and the chemical companies) launched a publicity campaign against UKACO to discredit them in the eyes of farmers. The campaign against UKACO by the USDA and the chemical companies was very persistent, and successful.  UKACO was forced to close its doors because of the lack of customers.

This wasn’t an isolated incident in the history of radionics. Many times when it was proven radionics was much more successful and much cheaper than using conventional methods such as spraying chemicals. The big boys at the chemical companies would get their pals in government to either discredit or take legal action against the radionic practitioner. Another similar story about using radionics to control insects eating trees in the forest can be read HERE.

15 thoughts on “The History of Radionics, UKACO

  1. we as a group in nsw Australia are using radionics to persuade pests to move away somewhere they may enjoy..would like to share information on insects, animals etc.. with radionics..

    Like

  2. Hi richard, radionics has and is being used very successfully to rid fields and forests of insects and other pests such as rodents, but unlike UKACO in the 1950’s who used pesticides in their radionic instruments to rid fields of insects ( which worked very well) pepole using radionics today perfer to strenghten the crop and or to make the field uncomfortable to the insects in other ways other than using pesticides in their radfionic instruments and broadcasting that to a field which can destroy not only the destructive insects , but also the benifical ones as well as other critters.

    Thanks again richard, I was thinking about what to write in my next blog and you have given me the answer, I will write about how to use radionics to rid your garden or field of insect pests. look for my next post in the next 7 days, it should give you enough info to get started.

    Like

  3. It’s been suggested that we consider radionics here in Hawaii for the borer beetle that’s killing our ohia trees. I’m concerned that it would destroy beneficial insects (bees etc.)

    Like

    1. Hi Kerry. one of the great things about radionics is that you can target the destructive insects, and at the same time not harm the benifical ones. The way UKACO did it they probally killed the good with the bad. Today getting rid of destructive insects is done differently. In Canada radionics was used to fight a spruce budworm infestation problem. You can read about it here:
      https://radionicsspectro.com/2017/09/04/how-radionics-was-more-successfull-in-combating-the-spruce-budworm-than-chemical-spraying/

      Like

      1. One thing that bothers me are the instructions about photos. It seems to me that if I used a photo from a smartphone and it didn’t work then I’d me advised to buy a film camera. Why not eliminate the remote possibility that it wouldn’t work (waiting an entire season to find out) by instructing users to start with film photos?

        Like

  4. Hi Kerrith King i read the blog from the link you sent. When I first was introduced to radionics, I didn’t really believe it was possible for something like radionics to work, but I proved to myself it certainly does work, and in many cases it works extremely well.

    There is a lot of ‘hidden knowledge” in the world that the “powers that be” “the vested interests” do not want us to know about, radionics is one of those things. The main reason that they don’t want radionics to go mainstream, is they want to continue to medicate everyone with their pills and potions, and at the same time make billions each year (the pharmaceduical industry)

    Ever since I discoved radionics, I’ve made apromise to myself that I will not belive anything until I prove it to myself. Radionics has passed the test with flying colors.

    Like

      1. Well Kerry to answer your question “Who are you?”. I am someone who first learned about radionics a few years ago, since then I have learned as much as I possibly could about the subject. I have witnessed things happen in radionics, both by myself as well as other radionic practitioners that were amazing, even miraculous, but when you understand the science behind radionics, you realize these things follow a natural law that even “modern science” doesn’t know about.

        Like

  5. You can dowse using a radionic instrument ” is this a suitable witness” if you get a YES use it if NO don’t use it. I personally use photos taken with an Instax camera, siliar to the old poloroid cameras that were tradionally used for radionic work. I havbe never used a photo taken with a digital camera or phone, but read that photos taken with a high quality digital camera make a good witness.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s